Tuesday, 14 June 2011
I blame Ghost Hunters for this one.
I’ve watched the show for years, and enjoyed how they investigated (as
they went in with the idea of what the reports are have natural, not
supernatural, explanations). While
they’re based in Connecticut ,
they’d go all over the country. The
Ghost Hunters Team has visited places in western New York before, but nothing I ever thought
would be worth a trip out to see. But
when they went to this place (the episode first aired the previous April), I
knew it was a location I wanted to visit.
Located in Worcester ,
Massachusetts , I knew this
wouldn’t be far of a drive, and would make a perfect day trip. Today’s destination was the Higgins Armory
Museum .
The weather was a little bit rainy
(no surprise on this trip), and I volunteered to drive. Mum came up with a route which she assured me
would be better than taking Interstate 87 to Albany and picking up the Mass
Turnpike. There’s a reason why I like
driving on highways. Most of the time, I
want to maximize my time at my destination, so the quicker I get there the
better. Mum’s choice of route was rural
residential roads that brought us east of Albany ,
where we then picked up the Mass Turnpike.
Okay, that added and extra half-hour to the trip, and I didn’t need to
stop for snacks along the way. Once on
the Turnpike, I was able to make decent time to Worcester .
The Higgins Armory
Museum wasn’t hard to
find. Heading down the main artery in
the city, we looked across the skyline to see the large steel, castle-like
building with medieval-style flags on top.
Normally I’d say can’t miss that, but I’d been to Worcester in circa 1999 to visit Glen and Amy
Stegner when they were living there, and some how I didn’t notice it then. More likely I actually noticed it, didn’t
realize what it was, and Glen didn’t know what the hell I was talking about
when I described it (which was no different from when we were room mates in
college).
At the entrance where there’s a
“guest book” for visitors to sign in, I mentioned that I’d seen this place on Ghost Hunters, and that’s why I’d come
all the way from Texas
to visit. They mentioned since the
airing of that episode, they’d had an influx of new visitors. Talk about the power of free
advertising. When we paid the admission
fee ($10), we first went to a small theatre to watch a short film on the
history of the museum. Steel
industrialist John Woodman Higgins had been collecting armor and weapons for
years, and when the collection grew too large if of course caused problems with
his spouse. Mr. Higgins then founded the
museum in 1931 to display his items in a manner that could be enjoyed by others
to. This four-story building’s footprint
in a V-like shape and made of steel and glass, and the design was inspired by
European castles.
The first floor has the gift shop,
small café, and “Orientation Gallery” which showed some of the earliest pieces
obtained by Mr. Higgins. The second
floor has a “classroom” designed to educate children about medieval armor, and
the “Department of Curiosities” which has displays of “mythological creatures”
and “strange artifacts.” This reminded
me of the warehouse in the Indiana Jones movies, and seemed a little
out-of-place in the building. Not sure
if this was a side fascination of Mr. Higgins, or something which was added
later to compliment the children’s section.
The third floor has high-arched
ceilings with displays of armor, and various weapons, each with an information
card describing what it is and its century of origin. The two wings of the hall are lines with
flags on each of the pillars. The fourth
floor is more of a balcony which overlooks the third (and is on same level of
the flags).
This was like a visual version of
those “arms & equipment guides” in those fantasy role-playing games I used
to play. Seeing some of the items here
would answer the questions of what the difference between a “mace” and a
“morning star” was (something which RPGers argued about a lot in the days
before the internet). The morning star
was a long pole with a bunch of metal spikes on the end, and mace was more of a
shorter club (without the spikes). The
“ball and chain” commonly used in fantasy movies mistakenly called a mace is
actually a flail.
Some of the other representations
were of tournaments, like jousting or just two knights in single combat. While armor was heavy, you could see its
placement allowed a free-range of movement.
Knights weren’t turtles that couldn’t get back up because of the weight
of what they wore. You could also see
what allowed the freedom of movement also created gaps where lucky shots could
maim or cause mortal wounds (like the areas around the arm pits, for example).
The wooden square for these two
knights was the medieval equivalent of a boxing ring. It kept the combatants near each other, which
allowed them to bash each other easier.
Being that close makes thrusting attacks for difficult, thus it created
a less chance for fatalities. Lords
wanted their knights to spar to enhance their skill, but they didn’t want to
keep training new knights.
Jousting had a similar idea in mind
as there’s a fence which keeps each of the knights on their own side. It also kept the horses from crossing each
other’s paths, which could cause serious damage to the animals. Horses had expensive upkeep and took time to
train, while there was always some squire that wanted to prove his worth to a
lady-in-waiting, and was willing to get beat up to do it. It’s not to say there were accidents were
someone died from a given blow, or a combatant played dirty intending to cause
injury, but the nobility did try to minimize these occurrences.
It’s not just European weapons on
display here, but arms from around the globe.
The regalia of the Japanese samurai are one of the most common
non-European styles of armor most Westerners know, but it also had suits from Persia and India as well. Likewise, how most people are familiar with
the weapons of the samurai (katanna long sword, and the shorter wakizashi),
you’d think there were only so many ways one could fold metal to make bladed
weapons.
These two swords from India
were ones I hadn’t seen before, and must’ve been very interesting to wield in
combat. The one in the foreground was a
“nandaka,” also known as a “sword of Vishnu,” and the other was a “zulfiqar,”
also called the “split-bladed sword” (for obvious reasons). Both date from the 1600s, and they weighed
about two and three pounds, respectively.
Like armor, weapons had to be strong, but they couldn’t be so heavy that
they couldn’t be used.
Two of my personal favorite bladed
weapons are the katar (the “punching dagger” from India ), and the kukri (the curved
Nepalese knife). There was a display of
different styles of katar’s, but not a kukri in sight. While I was glad it was more than European
stuff, I didn’t expect this place to have every weapon ever made. Seeing the Indian swords showed that as much
as I know about the subject, there was still more to learn. The next display case I found caused me to do
a double-take. First I thought I was
looking at weapons that only a Klingon would wield.
These vicious-looking weapons
weren’t fiction, but just a small sample of the blades from the Congo region of Central
Africa . While crafted to be
useful in dispatching enemies, they were also useful in intimidating opponents,
as well as being symbols of family status.
I was rather impressed by this, as these were both functional and
eye-catching.
Other displays in the museum showed
the names of each of the pieces of full plate armor, and a series of shots to
show how easily (and relatively quickly) these items could be put. One thing which was nice about the building was
the architectural features. While the
Great Hall consisted of stone work to mimic a castle, the stairwell was laced
with decorative steel vines.
I had every intention of bringing
my copy of Where When How with me for
any possible photo opportunities, but left it in the car. Once I’d realized it, there was no reason to
run back to get it. There were a few
places I could’ve gotten pictures, I think I just enjoyed the museum more
without having to worry about it. Before
we left, we stopped in the entry area to get a shot of the dog-suit of armor.
We did our standard questioning,
and received a tip for a lunch location.
Not too far from our location was O’Connor’s Restaurant & Bar. This had the feel of a traditional Irish pub,
with the elegance of a fine dinning. It
had a full menu, and the meal we had was very awesome. I grabbed a copy for Shawn & Veronica, as
I thought this was a place they’d enjoy.
As we headed back towards New York , we’d considered taking the scenic route back
along the Mohawk Trail (which was the route we’d take to visit Earl at Amherst ), but it had
started to rain. While the overcast
nature would be an obstruction to the view, the potentially slick conditions
wouldn’t be the smartest thing to do try on the Hair-Pin Turn. I guess that section of Massachusetts would be one I’d take a stab
at on a future trip. We did end up
taking a roundabout route from the Mass Turnpike north to Pittsfield ,
and then to North Adams .
From there it was some winding
route where I turned where Mum told me to do so which took us past Williams College ,
and The Clark Museum (which we’d visited back on the April 2008), and then into
Vermont . We worked our way to Manchester , where we drove past Hildene
(which was a place I remember visiting in Humanities class, back in senior
high). Hildene was the summer home of
Robert Todd Lincoln (the only son of President Lincoln). This was some place of a historical nature
that I’d have to come back on a later trip so I could re-appreciate the
history.
The “back roads journey” of “Mum
directing me this way” continued as we passed some small Vermont
towns I vaguely recalled being in, and then to back into New
York near Salem . Once we reached Argyle, we’d completed the
circle begun earlier in the day. The
drive through the countryside was pretty interesting, and it was a decent way
to end out the day.
More information can be found on the places we visited at:
Higgins Armory: www.higgins.org
O’Connor’s: www.oconnorsrestaurant.com
Hildene: www.hildene.org
*** 30 ***
No comments:
Post a Comment